2. It is recognized that the Defendants, who recognized all of the instant offenses, are against the Defendants, and that each of the instant offenses was committed under the proposal and the initiative of the accomplices E, and that there are circumstances to consider the Defendants’ participation.

However, it is also recognized that all the Defendants were punished several times for the same crime, the Defendants committed the instant crime during each repeated crime period, did not reach an agreement with the victims up to the heart, and did not recover all the damages.

In addition, in full view of the various circumstances that are conditions for sentencing, such as the age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, background, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, and there are no special circumstances or changes in circumstances that make it possible to change the sentencing of the court below after the judgment of the court below, each sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, all appeals by the Defendants are without merit. Thus, all appeals by the Defendants are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.