However, the execution of imprisonment for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On July 29, 2016, the Defendant: (a) at the main point of “D” located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, around July 21, 2016; (b) the victim E (55 years of age) who is an employee of the Defendant’s business entity and provided communication related to the business; and (c) the dangerous thing that had been on his/her customer due to a dispute, which became a trial expense, was considerably divided; (d) the victim’s face was collected at one time by gathering 500CC beer; and (e) the victim’s face was inside and outside the number of days of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding E;

1. Application of each of the visual Acts and subordinate statutes to the field photographs and images on the upper part thereof;

1. Articles 258-2 and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

1. Mitigation of discretionary mitigation under Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act.

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Special Consideration in the preceding sentence);