However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.

1. On July 9, 2016, the Defendant violated the Framework Act on Fire Services: (a) called “a bridge” to a 119 situation room in front of the Man-gu, Mayang-gu; (b) called “a bridge” and demanded the dispatch of a fire official; (c) the Defendant called to the scene of fire officials C (Nam, 31) and D (Nam 28 years old), check the Defendant’s condition; and (d) asked whether he will go to the hospital or not; and (e) the Defendant refused to go to the hospital, and said that he would go to his house at the bar.

However, the defendant was under the influence of alcohol but can sufficiently return home due to his own force, so the above fire officers dispatched are required to return home of the person under the influence of the fire officers.

Although the defendant explained that he cannot accept the Gu, the defendant expressed his explanation to the above fire officers on the ground that he does not accept his own request, the defendant expressed his desire for about 10 minutes for the above fire officers such as "It is difficult to see that he is a public official or she is a public official," and the above fire officers Category C put their faces on two occasions, and put other fire officers D who were next to the above fire officers.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with life-saving or emergency medical services by assaulting the fire fighter dispatched.

2. The Defendant, like Paragraph 1, experienced a disturbance against fire officials, and around 04:40 on July 9, 2016, at the site of the head of the Ansanan Police Station Edistricted by the Ansanan Police Station Edistricted by a fire official who was reported by the fire official, asked the Defendant for a self-refinite to ask him/her, and the above head of the police station asked him/her about whether he/she is in governance, he/she will be infinite, finite, finite, and finite, and put him/her several times to the finite.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous articles and interfered with police officers' legitimate execution of their duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. C.D.