사기
The crimes listed in [Attachment 1] Nos. 2 through 16 of [Attachment 1] of the judgment of the defendant, and the crimes listed in Annex 2 of the judgment.
Punishment of the crime
[criminal records] On September 30, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one year to be a crime of fraud at the Changwon District Court for a two-year period of imprisonment, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 8 of the same year, and on February 7, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years to imprisonment for a crime of fraud at the Busan District Court for a three-month period.
2. 15. The judgment becomes final and conclusive and is still under suspension of execution.
[1] On May 31, 2016, the Defendant, “2017 Godan 298,” published a false statement on the victim IS, who reported and contacted the above writing, stating that “The Defendant would sell the 4th 8.10,000 won Twitet to the 8.10,000 won.”
However, in fact, the defendant did not have any tweet so even if he received the payment from the injured party, he did not have the intention or ability to sell the tweet.
The Defendant received KRW 764,00 from the injured party to the Busan Bank account in the name of the Defendant on the same day, and received a total of KRW 8.10,00 from the Busan Bank account, and acquired property profits equivalent to the total of KRW 8.10,00 from that time, and from February 28, 2017, the new bank account “IT” recorded in the attached Form 1 “V” is correct since it is apparent that it is a clerical error in “V.”
As stated in the list of crimes, 18 victims acquired financial benefits equivalent to 10,270,000 won in total.
2. On January 28, 2017, the Defendant, “2017 Godan569, 2017, the Defendant posted a letter on the Internet SNS Twitter bulletin, thereby falsely stating that “The Defendant would sell contact diskettes in KRW 3.50,00,00” to the victim IU who contacted with the Defendant.
In fact, the defendant did not have a contact book sold at the time, so even if he received the money from the injured party, he did not have the intent or ability to sell the ticket to the injured party.
Ultimately, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.