2. The Defendant appears to reflect the crime of this case, and the victim H did not want to be punished against the Defendant. However, the above favorable circumstances appear to have been reflected at the time of the judgment of the court below, and there is no change in circumstances in the trial thereafter, and the Defendant repeated the crime of obstruction of performance of official duties, despite the fact that the Defendant’s previous crime of violence was two times, the previous crime of obstruction of official duties was five times, and the previous crime of obstruction of official duties was committed once, and in light of all the sentencing conditions indicated in the records of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character, character, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the sentence of the court below against the Defendant is too unreasonable.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.