However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 22:00 on April 4, 2015, the Defendant assaulted “D” main points located in Busanjin-gu, Busan, on the ground that: (a) the Defendant’s slopeF belonging to the Busanjin Police Station E-gu, Busan, which was called “C” and called “D” to the effect that the Defendant was on the 112 report that the Defendant was on the fright; (b) the Defendant fright to the E-gu, Busan, Police Station E-gu, and called “Chra in calculating the drinking value and return to the fright.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reports by police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the police protocol of statement to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Reasons for sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 months to one year and four months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (the special person who has been sentenced] [decision of the sentence] The defendant appears to have the attitude of acknowledging and opposing the crime; the degree of obstruction of official duties; the degree of obstruction of official duties; the absence of the same criminal power; the defendant's health condition, etc.