2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On August 27, 2013, the Plaintiff entered the Army. On October 25, 2013, the Plaintiff was on the part of the Army and served in the 3rd Class B of the 28th class of the 3rd class of the 28th class of the 3rd class of the 3rd class of the 2013th group. On November 21, 2013, the Plaintiff was on the part of the 2013 grouping event, and was on the part of the 5th class of the 2013 grouping event, and was on the part of the 5th class of the 5th grouping event.

On November 22, 2013, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Republic of Korea, the left-hand slives of the slives of the Republic of Korea, at a military hospital. The Plaintiff was diagnosed by the slives of the Republic of Korea on December 6, 2013.

Since January 8, 2014, the Plaintiff was discharged from active service on the grounds of official duty.

B. The Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person who rendered distinguished services to the State to the Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the instant injury”).

On October 8, 2014, the Defendant: “A soldier, who was wounded in the course of performing duties or education and training not directly related to the defense and security of the Gu or the protection of people’s lives and property” under the former part of Article 2(1)2 of the Act on Support for Persons Eligible for Veteran’s Compensation (hereinafter “the Act”), and discharged from military service; however, as a result of the physical examination, the degree of the injury was determined to fall short of the degree of injury according to the classification of disability ratings in attached Table 3 of the Enforcement Decree of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “the Act”), which is applicable mutatis mutandis

Accordingly, the plaintiff was subject to a re-examination, but the defendant judged that the disability rating on January 8, 2015 did not meet the grade criteria because there was no previous change in the disability rating.

(hereinafter “Disposition in this case”). 【No dispute exists, Gap 1 to 6 evidence, Eul 1 to 6 evidence, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination on the legitimacy of the disposition

A. The plaintiff's assertion: First, in light of the fact that it is impossible to walk over a long time due to symptoms kneeing down. The difference in this case.