2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant is in profoundly against the crime of this case, that the defendant's simple drinking and unlicensed driving did not cause a traffic accident, that is, it did not cause a serious trouble to the investigation by making a statement at the investigative agency to forge and commit the crime of this case, and that the defendant's family and his/her family appeal against the defendant.

However, in full view of all other circumstances, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive and circumstance of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, the court below's punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable, in light of the fact that the defendant had a previous conviction for drinking or non-licensed driving, and the defendant did not know even though he had been under suspension of execution due to the same kind of crime, and committed again the driver's license for drinking or non-licensed driving of this case, and that the crime is not good by forging and using a friendly signature for the purpose of evading the investigation as a result of drinking driving.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.