대여금
1. The part against the defendant among the judgment of the court of first instance against the defendant B is revoked, and the plaintiff as to the revoked part against the defendant B.
1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except when adding or adding to, the following is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance.
2. As follows, the part added or dried shall consist of the 5th 21 to 6th 19 parallels in the judgment of the first instance.
The following circumstances acknowledged by the above facts and the evidence, i.e., ① Defendant B, on March 2, 2009, withdrawn KRW 58,574,462 with the Plaintiff’s own seal on the withdrawal money, and then remitted KRW 874,462 to the corporate bank account known to the Plaintiff. As such, the Plaintiff appears to have known or could have known the remainder of KRW 50 million in the process. ② The Plaintiff and the above Defendant, upon preparing the loan certificate, agreed to first repay interest KRW 50 million on March 3, 2009, which is the day following the above withdrawal date, and the Defendant immediately agreed to repay interest KRW 200,000 among them, KRW 50,000,000,000 to the Plaintiff, ③ the Plaintiff’s previous loan was KRW 14,500,000,000,000,000,0000,000,000 won was 20,000,000.
4. The plaintiff first requested that the above defendant lend KRW 200 million to the investigative agency, and the sum of the previous loans shall be 19.0 million.