구상금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the Plaintiff corresponding to the following additional payment order shall be revoked.
1. The circumstances leading up to the instant accident are as follows.
At the time of the accident, on August 25, 2018, at the time of the insured vehicle D E of the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff, and around 14:09 on August 25, 2018, the first side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was proceeding in the parking lot in the G third underground parking lot located in the Seoul Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, was the ground for recognition of KRW 3,078,00,00 for the payment of shock insurance money to the driver’s seat fronter of the Defendant’s vehicle to the above passage from the right side of the vehicle of the Plaintiff, and KRW 50,00,00 for the self-paid vehicle of the insured vehicle of the Plaintiff’s insured vehicle of KRW 1,2,3,5,6,7,7,9,10, evidence No. 12-2, Eul’s evidence No. 2 and 3, and the purport of the entire
2. In light of the aforementioned evidence, the driver of the Defendant vehicle who tried to enter the intersection where the line of the parking zone is located in the area where the line of the parking zone and the passage are located, and should enter the road at the left speed and shock the Plaintiff vehicle by entering the road without such a way; the Defendant vehicle could have sufficiently seen the Plaintiff vehicle from the Defendant vehicle’s seat before entering the road; the Defendant vehicle is driving the vehicle on the front left side of the road; the Defendant vehicle driven the direction of the running of the painting ticket marked on the floor of the parking zone and the opposite direction; the driver of the vehicle who wants to enter the intersection at the same time without traffic control (Article 26(3) of the Road Traffic Act); thus, the driver of the vehicle who wants to enter the intersection should yield the way to the right side road (Article 26(3) of the Road Traffic Act); the Plaintiff vehicle is deemed to have been negligent in entering the intersection, and the vehicle ratio between the Plaintiff and the driver of the vehicle in light of the circumstances such as the vehicle’s fault and the vehicle.
Therefore, the Defendant’s indemnity amounting to KRW 2,004,60 = Total damage amounting to KRW 3,578,000 x 70% x self-payment amounting to KRW 500,000 and Supreme Court Decision on January 28, 2016.