2. Where the defendant does not pay the above fine. < Amended by Presidential Decree No. 16090, Jan. 1

The defendant married with the victim D on October 28, 2013, but is currently in a divorce lawsuit.

On December 22, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 20:0, at the house of the Defendant and the victim in Sejong-si E apartment 308 704 dong 704 , and (b) during the marital fighting between the victim and the husband, the Defendant was divided into the victim’s head debt and the victim’s head debt.

The defendant continued to take the two arms of the victim of the defect that the victim resist and intends to resist, and was able to stop the victim's left hand.

As a result, the defendant puts the victim with a sacrife and dye dye dye dye dye, which requires treatment for about five weeks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant's statement in court (the purport that he/she has a citizen's interest in the court);

1. The witness D’s legal statement (in light of the fact that, even if based on the results of the inquiry into the astronomical Hospital, it is deemed that there is credibility in the legal statement in light of the fact that D reported the fact of damage to the police, it is argued that the police officer dispatched at the time was humping off the hume and the hume of the hume at the hume and the hume of the hume at the hume and the hume of the hume and the hume of the hume at the hume and the fact that D

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of the Act and subordinate statutes as a result of fact-finding on the astronomical disease hospital;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;