The Defendant, along with the victim E, went out from November 23, 2015 to November 24, 2015, 2015. The Defendant: (a) went out in the election of the branch head of the Seoul Private Passenger Taxi Association D; and (b) the Defendant, despite the fact that the victim went out to the above branch office of the Association D; and (c) did not have stolen the USB, etc. entering the office of the Association D branch; (d) the Defendant, for the purpose of falling the victim, had the victim spread false information that slanders the victim in gas charging stations, etc. which many members of the said D branch of the Association, for the purpose of falling the victim; and (e) from around 19:00 on November 18, 2015 to around 20:0, three persons from the private taxi stop located adjacent to the government-Si Ga branch office located adjacent to the Plaintiff’s reputation chips by openly pointing out the victim’s reputation chips such as H, etc. to the Defendant.

2. In light of the case’s judgment, witness H and I’s respective legal statements, it is insufficient to recognize that the evidence presented by the prosecutor alone, which is admissible, was collected by three persons, such as H and I, from the date and time indicated in the facts charged, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge otherwise.

3. In conclusion, the facts charged in this case constitute a case where there is no proof of crime, and thus, the defendant is acquitted under the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment of the defendant is publicly announced under the main sentence of Article 5