B shall be punished by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

Defendant

B If the above fine is not paid, 100,000 won.

Defendant

B(57 years of age, inn, in order to receive 1,722,500 won in money that Defendant B did not receive after being supplied with grains, such as rice, to E and Defendant A (42 years of age, inn) respectively.

1. Defendant B’s crime

A. On February 26, 2014, Defendant B, who interfered with the business, returned to the stores of “Fmat” located in the Gu Council city G on February 18:30, 2014, and Defendant A did not receive the outstanding amount, thereby obstructing Defendant A’s work by force for about 30 minutes, such as “whether money would not be distorted in this large amount of fee, or by making money inside,” and “I am a large voice.”

B. Defendant B continues to do so.

At the time and place of this subsection, Defendant B had a telephone connected to Defendant B’s husband, and Defendant A her handphone her handphone was her hand, and Defendant A her handphone was her hand, and the handphone her handphone was her hand, and the handphone her handphone was her hand off on the floor and damaged the repair cost of KRW 8,00,000.

2. Defendant A’s crime committed on February 26, 2014 (hereinafter “Defendant A”) is within the “Fmat” located in G in Gu Government-si on February 20, 2014.

For the reasons stated in the preceding paragraph, while Defendant B was in dispute with Defendant B, two parts of the Defendant B’s order was “time” and the indictment was “time”. However, as such stated above, it is recognized that there is no substantial disadvantage to Defendant A’s exercise of the right of defense, it shall be changed ex officio as above.

Violenced.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant B’s legal statement

1. Protocol concerning the suspect interrogation of each of the Defendants

1. Each statement and estimate prepared by the defendant A and H;

1. Application of damaged photographs and USB video-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant legal provisions applicable to criminal facts B: Articles 314(1) and 366( point of interference with business) of the Criminal Act; Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act ( point of interference with business)

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Defendant B among concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.