When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 31, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 20:10 on May 31, 2016, the Defendant called, “A victim D (50 years old) who had been installing a Baduk in Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government 4th floor C, saying, “The Defendant interfered with the entry and exit of the former who was installed in the flag.”

Therefore, the victim will be able to complete the Baduk.

The Defendant, “,” and the Defendant, “In the event of fluort fluort, fluort fluort, fluort fluort,”

“The victim’s face was taken twice by drinking, and the victim’s breath was bread and boomed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on police statements made to D;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act of the choice of punishment (where the defendant committed the instant crime on the grounds that he/she was dead even though he/she had been convicted of the same criminal records and several times, it is recognized that the defendant committed the instant crime on the grounds that he/she was guilty, and the degree of violence is relatively not more severe, and there is

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;