대여금
1. The Plaintiff:
A. The Defendants jointly pay KRW 50,000,000 and interest thereon from May 11, 2012 to the date of full payment.
1. The facts constituting the cause of the claim do not conflict between the parties, or may be acknowledged by taking into account the overall purport of the pleadings, as a whole, each entry in the evidence Nos. 1 to 3 (including the branch numbers).
On November 10, 2009, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 50 million to the Defendants, KRW 2 of interest month, and maturity on November 201. The Defendants paid only interest from April 11, 201 to April 201 and did not pay at all the agreed interest rate of 24% per annum and principal amount.
In addition, around March 2, 2009, the Plaintiff loaned KRW 20 million to Defendant B with the due date set on June 2, 2010, and Defendant B did not complete payment.
2. Determination
A. Judgment by public notice on the claim against Defendant B (Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
B. As to the Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant C, the Defendant C appeared on the date of pleading, and recognized the authenticity of the evidence No. 1-1 [a certificate of cash storage (a certificate)], and the Defendant B knew that all of the claims would be resolved, there is no special assertion otherwise that the Plaintiff would legally restrain the Plaintiff’s claim of this case.
3. Conclusion in favor of the Plaintiff