beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2020.10.16 2020가단8048

양수금 등

Text

1. The Defendants shall deliver to the Korea Land and Housing Corporation the real estate listed in the attached real estate list.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.

Reasons

1. On January 29, 2012, the networkF (hereinafter “the network”) entered into a lease agreement with the Korea Land and Housing Corporation on the attached real estate list (hereinafter “instant real estate”) with the terms of KRW 20,960,00 for lease deposit, KRW 112,520 for monthly rent, and period for lease from February 1, 2012 to January 31, 2014 for lease (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”).

On April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff lent KRW 14,000,00 to the Deceased. Around April 30, 2012, the Plaintiff entered into a lease deposit agreement with the Deceased to transfer KRW 18,20,000, out of the lease deposit claims held by the Deceased against the Korea Land and Housing Corporation under the instant lease agreement between the Deceased and the Deceased, and the Deceased notified the Korea Land and Housing Corporation of the transfer of the deposit by mail.

The Deceased died on March 28, 2020, and the Defendants, a lineal descendant of the Deceased, jointly inherited the deceased’s property.

On the other hand, the copy of the complaint of this case containing the Plaintiff’s expression of intent to seek the delivery of the real estate of this case against the Defendants by subrogation of the Korea Land and Housing Corporation was delivered to Defendant C around September 2, 2020 and around July 12, 2020 to Defendant D.

[Reasons for Recognition] Each entry of Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

A. According to the above facts finding as to the Plaintiff’s assertion on the grounds of claim, the instant lease agreement was terminated at the expiration of the term.

Therefore, the defendants, the inheritor of the deceased, are obligated to deliver the real estate of this case to the Korea Land and Housing Corporation, except in special circumstances.

I would like to say.

B. As to the determination of Defendant D’s assertion, Defendant D claimed for a qualified acceptance trial in the inheritance of the deceased’s property, Defendant D’s obligation is limited to the scope of inherited property.