업무방해등
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
Punishment of the crime
[Majority Crime] On January 24, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to six months of imprisonment with prison labor due to the obstruction of business in the Gangnam District Court’s branch court branch court, and completed the execution of the sentence in the Gangnam Prison on June 1, 2017.
[Criminal facts]
1. On June 10, 2017, the Defendant ordered alcohol at the main point of the victim D’s operation in Gangnam-si, Gangnam-si, the Defendant: (a) ordered alcohol in a drunken state; (b) but, in order to receive the victim’s return home from the victim, the Defendant: (c) took a bath at the large interest of “Sign, ASEAN,” and obstructed the victim’s main business operation by force by avoiding an disturbance for about 30 minutes, including paying time expenses.
2. Around 21:35 on June 10, 2017, the Defendant insultd the victim publicly, such as the victim’s flusium, “it is not clean to see fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, fluor, at the front of the main point as indicated in paragraph (1).”
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of the accused by the prosecution;
1. Each police statement made to F or D;
1. Complaint;
1. A report on investigation (Attachment of on-site photographs);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, each investigation report (as a result of the search of prisoners, results of search of prisoners subject to investigation, attachment of detailed details on the case, period of repeated offense, and confirmation of criminal records of the same kind);
1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act provides that a person interferes with the business of making a decision on the selection of the relevant criminal facts and the punishment: Article 311 of the Criminal Act (Selection of Imprisonment with prison labor);
1. Article 35 of the Criminal Act for aggravated repeated crimes;
1. The defendant's assertion of concurrent crimes as to the defendant's assertion of Article 37 (former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 (In addition, to the extent that the punishment is aggregated with the long-term punishment of two crimes as indicated in the holding, aggravating concurrent crimes with the punishment as set forth in the holding, to the extent that the punishment