상병불승인처분취소
1. The Defendant’s disposition of non-approval of the first industrial accident compensation insurance rendered on October 5, 2016 to the Plaintiff is revoked.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. On December 20, 2007, the Plaintiff was diagnosed as follows: “B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “B”) a company that sells or sells steel works made in the modern steel as it is, and applied for medical care benefits to the Defendant, after receiving the diagnosis of “Catch credit in the left, fatum, fatum, chatum, chatum, chatum, chatum, chatum and tensions, vertebrate No. 5, and vertebrate No. 1-Wol No. 1. 1.”
B. On October 5, 2016, the Defendant rendered a decision to grant partial approval to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the following grounds: (a) the Defendant rendered a partial approval of the instant injury and disease No. 1-Woman No. 1 of the verteball Track No. 1 (hereinafter “limited to the non-approval injury and disease”) to the Plaintiff No. 1 of the verteball Track No. 1 (hereinafter “non-approval decision”).
[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, entry of evidence No. 3, purport of the whole pleadings
2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful
A. Since the Plaintiff’s assertion continuously and continuously carried heavy objects for a long time, moving heavy objects from the attitude of putting them back, or imposing heavy burden on steel Banbing, etc., the instant injury and disease was caused or aggravated by performing duties to impose on the Banbing and supervising sections, and thus, a proximate causal link between the Plaintiff’s duties and the instant injury and disease was recognized, the Defendant’s disposition of this case based on a different premise is unlawful.
B. The Plaintiff, such as labor relations, etc. (1) entered into a labor relationship on October 20, 2007, and thereafter conducted the production of wood tea in a wooden factory from October 13, 2007 to December 31, 2012, and conducted the production of wood tea in a wooden factory, from January 1, 2013 to May 8, 2015.
The Plaintiff served from 5 days a week, from 8:00 to 20:00 a day (from 12:00 to 13:00, from 17:00 to 17:30).
(A) Production of wood as detailed details of duties, etc.