2. The gist of the facts charged is that the Defendant is a member of the E Women’s Association (hereinafter “Women”) and the F, the president of the Women’s Association, intended to exclude the Defendant from the performance hall for the purpose of excluding the Defendant from the performance hall for the purpose of doing so and interfere with F’s work.

On September 6, 2010, the Defendant, at around 18:00 on September 6, 201, found it at the monthly meeting of the Women’s Council held on the second floor of the G Building at Guri-si (hereinafter “the first meeting of this case”). At around 18:0, the Defendant interfered with the business of September 6, 2010, the Defendant interfered with F’s legitimate holding of the meeting and carrying out the business affairs of F by force by forcing F to waive the proceedings of the meeting, while 20 members are holding a monthly meeting.

B. Around 17:00 on March 18, 201, the Defendant’s interference with the business of March 18, 201 was found at the place of the preceding port prior to the meeting on March 17, 201, and at the same time, 20 members were working at the settlement meeting of accounts (hereinafter “the second meeting of this case”). On January 25, 201, the term of office of the Chairman has expired, and the term of office of the Chairman has expired. A female who was accused has come to the end of the meeting. The term of office was “whether there is any reason why and money are divided at the end of the meeting,” and the Defendant had F waived the meeting, thereby obstructing F to the legitimate holding and proceeding affairs of F.

3. The lower court’s determination is with respect to the interference with the first meeting of this case, and ① The first meeting of this case is free on a broad subject.