요양불승인처분취소
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1...
The court's explanation of this case by the court of the first instance as to this case is the same as the ground for the first instance judgment except for the following modifications and additions. Thus, this case is quoted in accordance with Article 8 (2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
The grounds for the judgment of the first instance court for the amendment
4.2
Part VII of the “judgments” shall be amended to be less than the 12th line as follows:
According to the medical opinion on the Plaintiff’s medical record, the Plaintiff appears to have been suffering from the escape certificate of a retired signboard that has been proceeding over a long time due to the Plaintiff’s 4 and 5 change from the date of the instant accident. However, as seen above, the Plaintiff, as in the above facts, was suffering from the escape certificate of a retired conical signboard No. 4-5, but at the same time from October 10, 2012 to September 6, 2013, he/she conducted high strength without any pain pain for about 1 year from September 6, 2013, and caused a strong pain. Even after the instant accident, it is difficult to view that there was a possibility that the Plaintiff would have been suffering from the 6th anniversary of the date of the instant accident, such as the fact-finding, even after the completion of the period of the 6th time period of the escape from the hospital. In this regard, it is difficult to say that the remaining symptoms of the 5th day of the instant accident would have been separated from the 3th day of the instant symptoms.