except that the execution of each of the above penalties shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Defendant

A around 02:00 on February 18, 2014, around 02:0, on the ground that the case, while under the influence of alcohol at the Fju located in Geum-gu, Busan, would not cause microphones, and that the case, other than the case, was brought to dispute with the above G and the Defendant B, which is its driving.

1. At around 02:00 on February 18, 2014, Defendant A assaulted with the victim B (year 51) in the state of alcohol at the Friju located in Geum-gu, Busan, Fri-gu E by a method of gathering beer disease, which is a dangerous object on the table table, during the dispute with the victim B (year 51).

2. At the time and place specified in paragraph (1), Defendant B assaulted the beer’s disease, which is a dangerous object on the tables, in the course of dispute with the victim A (the age of 46) by means of gathering the victim’s disease toward the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ legal statement

1. Application of the police statement law to H

1. Relevant Articles 3(1) and 2(1)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, the Defendants’ choice of criminal punishment

1. Defendants subject to discretionary mitigation: Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act;

1. Defendants subject to suspended execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the reflection and agreement);