If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won shall be one day.

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a BM5 car.

On April 25, 2016, the Defendant driven the above car at around 04:50, and proceeded with the two-lane road in the Seogugu, Daegu, Seo-gu, as one lane, from the fugitive Corning off to the et bit string side, depending on the one lane.

On the road, there was a traffic safety sign prohibiting entry into the et-ray more from the surface of the fugitive Corporation, so there was a duty of care to ensure that the driver of the vehicle is obliged not to proceed in the direction of prohibiting entry by complying with the traffic safety sign.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and neglected to proceed with the above-mentioned road for prohibition of entry into the right-hand side of the victim E(61) driving on the right-hand side from the direction of the Defendant’s proceeding to the right-hand side of the driver’s car, and received the part behind the right-hand side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by the above occupational negligence, the injury of the victim E, such as satise, requiring a two-day medical treatment, and the injury of the victim G (Satren 41) who was accompanied by the said rocketing car, due to the 8-day medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement protocol (short traffic) made by the police to E;

1. Reporting on the occurrence of a traffic accident and reporting on a traffic accident;

1. On-site photographs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;

1. Article 3 (1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, the proviso to Article 3 (2) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, and Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of selective fine for punishment (the fact that the negligence is recognized, the attitude of reflecting the depth is shown, the vehicle is covered by comprehensive motor vehicle insurance and the victim who suffered serious injury is not subject to punishment, and there is no record that the defendant has been punished in excess of the same criminal record and fine.