When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The facts charged were revised to the extent that it does not infringe on the defendant's substantial right of defense.

On October 10, 2017, the Defendant, a substitute driver, opened the victim B(41) vehicle in order to mislead the victim B(41) with the customer vehicle and to search for the customer, and the victim was able to comply with it by the victim. The victim was able to respond to the Defendant.

The victim is, at the same time and place, the defendant has opened his/her own door on the same day and place, and "Is the door of another vehicle" of the defendant.

He shall start. He shall be designated as a driver, and he shall not be a representative driver.

The body of the defendant was tightly pushed off. The body of the defendant was tightly pushed off several times.

On the other hand, the defendant did not have the body of the victim several times in the above time and place.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect B of the police;

1. Application of the statutes governing screen pictures of the case site;

1. Relevant Article 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act selection of punishment, and selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is based on the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant was punished on the grounds of the sentencing of the instant crime; (b) the background leading up to the instant crime; (c) the degree of assault; and (d) the record of the commission of violence in 2007; and (c) other various circumstances, including the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct; and (d) the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., which form the conditions for sentencing specified in the records and pleadings of the instant case;