beta
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.12.08 2016고단3902

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 23, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment without prison labor for the violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents at the Daegu District Court on August 23, 201, and the judgment became final and conclusive on October 31, 2014.

On December 18, 2013, the Defendant, at around December 18, 2013, received the victim’s resident registration certificate, resident registration certificate, and passbook from the victim to restore the effect of the insurance policy, and used it to open and dispose of the mobile phone in the victim’s name, and used it to use the loan granted by the lending company for its personal purpose.

1. Forgery of private documents;

A. On December 20, 2013, the Defendant, without the consent of the victim, signed “B” in the column of customer information information on the applicant’s application for subscription, stating “B” in the column of resident registration number, “G” and “B” in the column of resident registration number, and signed “B” in the column of customer registration number.

B. On December 23, 2013, the Defendant entered “B” in the customer name column of customer information, “G” in the resident registration number column, and signed “B” in the subscriber column without the victim’s consent. The Defendant signed “B” in the subscriber column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising, the Defendant forged a new contract for the SKS service in the name of SST B, a private document on the rights and obligations, and a new application for the purchase of KT Y mobile, respectively.

2. Uttering a falsified investigation document;

A. The defendant 1-A

At the time, at the same time and place as stated in the paragraph, the above agency employees who knew of the forgery was held as if they were the document duly formed two copies of the new contract for the service.

B. The defendant 1-B

on the date and time, at the place, the forgery is known.