폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
1. Defendant A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year;
However, the above sentence shall be executed for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
1. On October 16, 2015, Defendant A, at a restaurant located in Seongdong-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seoul, on October 16, 2015, Defendant A talked with the victim B (29 years old) who was not a good reputation as workplace rent, and was able to talk with the victim B (29 years old) who was not a good reputation, Defendant C left the victim’s face with his/her finger floor and drinking with his/her hand over the floor when the victim’s face was taken, and her head was cut off on the breab in the above restaurant, and her head was cut off on the bridge of the victim, which is a dangerous object.
As a result, the Defendant carried dangerous objects and inflicted an injury on the blood species, etc. on the victim who could not know the treatment period.
2. Defendant B had the face of the Victim A (33 tax) taken place at the time, time, and place as set forth in paragraph (1). Defendant B had the face of the Victim A (33 tax) and had the scirls, which is a dangerous object, taken the victim.
In this respect, the defendant carried dangerous objects and assaulted the victim.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. Scephry images of CCTV;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;
1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and subparagraph A of the option of punishment against the crime: Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1)-2 of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1)-B: Articles 261 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act (the choice of punishment);
1. Defendant B who is detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act;
1. Defendant A who has been suspended from execution: Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the confession and reflect of the crime in this case, the fact that the crime in this case appears to be contingent crimes, the fact that there is no previous conviction beyond the fine, and the fact that the victim B and only agreed with the victim B does not want the punishment of the defendant);
1. Defendant B of the provisional payment order: Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act;