beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2018.10.24 2017나56148

손해배상(의)

Text

1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

Reasons

1. The grounds for appeal by the plaintiffs citing the judgment of the court of first instance are not significantly different from the allegations in the court of first instance, and the fact-finding and decision of the court of first instance are justified even if each additional evidence submitted to the court of first instance is presented to this court.

Therefore, the reasoning for the judgment of the court regarding the instant case is as follows, except for the following addition, including “2. Additional Judgment” as to the matters emphasized by the Defendants in relation to the Defendants’ negligence in the operation of the instant case, and therefore, it is acceptable to accept it in accordance with Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

The following shall be added to the "each evidence" of the 4th 13th 13th 10 judgment of the first instance court, and "the result of the entrustment of examination of medical records to the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency

The fourth 20th 20th Ga in the judgment of the first instance, "A", followed by the following: "It is judged that the process of the instant operation was appropriate in view of the situation, and it is not shaking that the instant operation was carried out rapidly with a heavy pain after the operation.

In the complex Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Mali-Ma

In light of these circumstances, “In light of these circumstances,” the 6th six pages of the first instance judgment, “In the light of these circumstances,” is added to “the typical side effects, or at least, that may arise from the instant surgery.”

2. Additional determination

A. The gist of the plaintiffs' assertion cannot be ruled out the possibility that the defendants inappropriate for towing of the trees during the course of the instant surgery by the defendants, which led to the aggravation of the symptoms of the Alley Dong-dong Epina, which led to the aggravation of the symptoms, and that the pain has deepened. The time when the Plaintiff made the brupt inserted.