손해배상(자)
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the plaintiffs who are ordered to pay additional amounts below.
1. The reasons why the court should explain this part of the facts of recognition are the same as that of the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, they are cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Determination
A. According to the facts of the recognition of the above liability for damages, the accident of this case is attributable to the defendant, as the insurer of the above truck, who is liable for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs due to the accident of this case, since the accident of this case, as the defendant, as the insurer of the above truck of this case, is liable to compensate for the damages suffered by the plaintiffs as a result of the accident of this case, even though D had to live well at the rear and left, and properly operate the steering direction and brakes.
B. The Plaintiff’s assertion that Plaintiff A is liable for damages 1) Plaintiff A’s assertion from July 14, 2012 to October 31, 2012, 2012, Plaintiff A was hospitalized for 110 days [18 days (12 days of hospitalization in the Seoul Central Hospital Hospital 18 days (12 days of hospitalization in the middle patient room)] from Seoul Central Hospital 18 days to October 31, 2012. Dur that period, Plaintiff C provided nursing, the Defendant is obligated to compensate Plaintiff A for nursing costs of 8,140,80 won (=74,08 won of ordinary wage in the second half of 201 x 110 days).
In addition, the plaintiff A paid KRW 800,000 for the extracurricular tuition to meet the learning difficulties during the above hospitalization period. Thus, the defendant is obligated to compensate the plaintiff for damages equivalent to the extracurricular tuition costs.
B) In full view of the overall purport of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence 3-1 and Eul evidence No. 9 related to the 1 opening expenses, it is recognized that plaintiff A received hospitalized treatment for 110 days from July 14, 2012 to October 31, 2012. In light of the degree of injury caused by the instant accident, the age of plaintiff A, etc., barring any special circumstance, the opening expenses during the hospitalization period of plaintiff A are recognized.
However, the plaintiff A is a 12-day hospitalization during the above hospitalization period, and a separate nurse during the period of hospitalization in a middle patient room.