beta
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2015.01.22 2014나913

손해배상

Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant is an accounting firm that conducted accounting audit for each business year in 2009 and 2010 with respect to Editer (hereinafter “Editer”)

B. Around March 2010, the Defendant submitted to the Financial Supervisory Service an audit report of Editer in 2009, and the audit report stated Editer’s “The sales revenue of Editer was KRW 3,164,99,211,865, the sales revenue of Editer was KRW 3,164,951,856, gross sales revenue of KRW 234,260,09, and sales loss was KRW 2,959,422,912, and KRW 475,13,030,030.”

Around March 2011, the Defendant submitted to the Financial Supervisory Service an audit report of the year 2010 on Editer to the Financial Supervisory Service, and stated, as above, the current sales, sales cost, gross sales profit, operating loss, and non-business profit in the immediately preceding business year (2009).

(hereinafter referred to as “instant audit report”) an audit report in 209 and 2010.

E. E.I.D. published the net sales amount from KRW 3,399, 211,865, to KRW 2,64,211,865, to KRW 3,64,865, to KRW 3,164,951,856, to KRW 2,464,951,856, to KRW 234,260,09 to KRW 239,260,009, to KRW 199,260,09, to KRW 2959, KRW 422,912 to KRW 2,94, KRW 42,912 to KRW 475,13,03,00 to KRW 513,030, and the gross sales amount to KRW 234,260,09, KRW 959, KRW 422,912 to KRW 475,130,030.

A. On March 23, 2012, Editer was designated in the administrative issues on the grounds that a series of business losses occurred in the last four business years, but it was de-listing on January 30, 2013 on the grounds that even though having undergone a de-listing real examination, it did not escape from the enemy continuously.

E. Meanwhile, as indicated below, the Plaintiff purchased 51,070 shares in Editer’s stocks and owns them up to the present day.

The number of stocks on the date of purchase (cost) on May 3, 201; 7,1007,524,500 on May 30, 201; 6,670 4,982,490 on June 23, 2011; 23,005,405,005,000 on March 28, 2012; < Amended by Act No. 10687, Mar. 28, 2012>