beta
(영문) 대구지방법원김천지원 2015.09.03 2013가단2043

노임 및 장비대금

Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 59,585,700 with respect to the Plaintiff and KRW 5% per annum from August 26, 2012 to September 3, 2015.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From February 25, 2011 to November 10, 2012, the Plaintiff is the Defendant Company’s “gold Industry Co., Ltd.” (hereinafter referred to as “gold Industry”).

The construction of this case is referred to as the "the construction of this case" when adding up the two sites of the Bridge, the C Section, and the above two sites of the C Section (hereinafter referred to as the "C Section") among the construction of the sewage pipeline rearrangement project in the Gyeongbuk-gun

) He participated in the construction site of this case and took charge of managing construction works, such as human body and civil petition treatment, while leasing equipment, such as vehicle number F, to the Defendant Company, five tons of dump trucks (vehicle number D), 2.5 tons of dump trucks (vehicle number E), and sump trucks (vehicle number F, etc.) owned by the Plaintiff.

B. On March 1, 2012, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company asserted that the instant agreement included the unpaid wage and equipment rent from June 1, 2011 to November 30, 2011, from May 28, 2015, the Defendant asserted that it included the unpaid wage and equipment rent until December 31, 2011, but, on the preparatory document dated July 23, 2015, the said agreement included the amount of construction until July 2012. However, in the Defendant’s written reply dated March 26, 2013, there is no evidence to prove that the confession was contrary to the truth.

The agreement to pay KRW 25 million with the rent for the equipment, such as wages and dump trucks not paid to the Plaintiff to the Plaintiff is "the agreement of this case".

However, the defendant company did not pay the above money until now.

C. When the Defendant Company delayed the payment of wages and equipment, the employees and the lessor of the instant construction visited the gold industry, which is the prime contractor, on June 2012. On June 27, 2012, the Plaintiff: (a) as the representative of the instant construction site; (b) G and Defendant Company, the representative of the equipment lessor; and (c) gold industry, along with the gold industry, on June 19, 2012.