When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The victim D is a member of the "E" company, and the defendant is a parent of a person operating a restaurant "F" restaurant in the building adjacent to the above company, and the dispute has occurred prior to this due to parking problems.

On April 10, 2017, the Defendant found a victim before the “E” office located in the 1st floor of G Building at the 1st floor of the G Building at the time of strike on April 10, 2017, and deducted trial expenses. On the hand hand, the Defendant saw the victim’s scambling and damaged scam and scambling, etc., which require treatment for about 14 days by taking the victim’s scam on one occasion.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness D and H in part;

1. Investigation report (Submission of suspect A-recording file or USB);

1. The written diagnosis of injury (based on the evidence in the judgment, it is recognized that the injured person forcibly booms the injured person with the defect in which the injured person intends to injure the defendant.

As such, it cannot be deemed that it is a legitimate defense when taking the other party's kives with force, and thus, the defendant and the defense counsel's legitimate defense cannot be accepted.

Application of Statutes

1. Article 257 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;