2. Although it is recognized that a mistake in judgment has been divided, such circumstance is considered in all the judgment of the court below, and there is no change of situation in the trial at the same time, on the other hand, the police officer who received a report and received a report and interfered with the exercise of legitimate public authority and the quality of the crime of this case which has interfered with the State's function, and has been punished for the crime of damaging public goods on October 29, 2008, and the public official used violence without being aware of the fact that there are many criminal records due to violent acts, and other conditions of sentencing as shown in the argument of this case such as the defendant's age, character, character and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the circumstances after the crime, etc. are considered, and thus, the defendant's assertion is not justified.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.