However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

피고인은 2015. 1. 8. 20:25경 부천시 오정구 오정로 253-1 오정휴먼시아 2단지 앞 노상에서, 탑승하고 가던 택시의 조향장치를 갑자기 틀어 놀란 택시운전기사와 시비를 하던 중 112신고를 받고 출동한 오정경찰서 B지구대 소속 경찰관 C으로부터 택시비를 지급하고 귀가하라는 말을 듣자 위 C에게 ‘요금을 내가 두 배로 주었는데 뭘 또 주냐 씨팔 놈아’라고 욕설을 하면서 손으로 위 C의 멱살을 잡아 흔들어 폭행함으로써 경찰공무원의 112 신고사건 처리에 관한 정당한 직무집행을 방해하였다.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to a copy of the damaged part photograph and the work log in the B district;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

2. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (hereinafter referred to as the following reasons for sentencing) of the Suspension of Execution [Scope of Recommendation] There is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the 1st category of the obstruction of performance of official duties (in the case of a person who has been specially punished] [decision of sentence] there is a need for strict punishment of the crime of obstruction of official duties for the sake of national legal order and the establishment of public authority. However, the sentence is determined as per the disposition in consideration of the fact that the victim is not punished, that the defendant is in depth against himself, and that the defendant is only