허위공문서작성
The Defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment of innocence of this case is publicly notified.
The Defendant, from January 20, 201 to April 22, 2012, was a public official in charge of D affairs while working for the Water and Wastewater Works Headquarters C in the original city from January 20, 201 to April 22, 2012, and currently served in the original city E.
On March 16, 2012, the Defendant, at the above C division office, conducted the evaluation of the business performance capabilities of eight enterprises participating in the bid for operation and management services entrusted to the private sector (hereinafter “instant bid”), and prepared the said business performance capabilities evaluation table (hereinafter “instant evaluation table”) by using a computer for the purpose of using it as meeting data to select a tendering company (hereinafter “instant bidding”).
The Defendant indicated 4.5 points in the column for the mechanical performance evaluation of a participant supervisor in each field, among the items of project performance evaluation of HTT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “HTT”), as a tendering company, as 0.63 points in the column for the project performance evaluation of CHT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “CA”), although the Defendant stated as 0.63 points in the column for the “AWT education and training” among the items of project performance evaluation of CBT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “CB”), the Defendant stated as 1.82 points in the column for the “performance of environmental technology” among the items of project performance evaluation of CBT Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “CBT”), the tendering company stated as 2 points in the “performance
Accordingly, the defendant, who is an official document, prepares a false evaluation table of this case in the name of the Director General of the Water and Wastewater Works Headquarters at the original city.
Defendant
There is no dispute over the objective content of the facts charged by the defense counsel.
However, during a short period of time, the excessive work process that requires an examination of related documents exceeding 2,00 pages is only a error of points in the evaluation sheet of this case, but does not intentionally state them differently from the fact.
This is from the inspection and investigation of the Ministry of Public Administration and Security to the police prosecutor.