beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.01.25 2018나19797

대여금

Text

1. The part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance shall be revoked;

2. The plaintiff's claim against the defendant is dismissed in entirety.

Reasons

1. The court's explanation on this part of the facts of recognition is the same as the corresponding part of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, citing this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the

2. According to the above facts of determination as to the cause of the claim, the defendant is jointly and severally obligated to pay to the plaintiff 1,20,00,000 won per annum within 17,972,621 won per annum within the limit of 1,930,131 won per annum within 20,000,000 won per annum within 165,00 won per annum within 20,000,000 won per annum of 1,930,130,000 won per annum within 165,000,000 won per annum of 1,930,005,00 won per annum of 25,000,000 won per annum of 26,000,00 won per annum of 165,06,000,000 won per annum of 26,016,000 won per annum of 26,015,000 won per annum of 16.

3. Judgment on the defendant's defense of extinctive prescription

A. Under the premise, the Defendant, in order to secure the Plaintiff’s obligation to the Plaintiff, is a 342 square meters of land and three-story neighborhood living facilities owned by the Defendant, in Songpa-gu Seoul.