A. The Prosecutor’s sentence (two years of imprisonment, two years of suspended execution, two years of probation, and one hundred and twenty hours of community service) is too unhued and unreasonable.

B. The lower court’s sentence is too unreasonable.

2. As to the propriety of the lower judgment’s sentencing sentence, it is not determined that the lower court’s sentence is too somewhat somewhat somewhat less or unreasonable when examining the various sentencing conditions shown in the arguments, including the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, and home environment, including the following sentencing factors.

A person under confinement: A person who has a criminal record of the same kind as imprisonment without prison labor or any heavier punishment, who has been mitigated from recidivism during the period of suspension of execution: Confession and partial repayment [the first instance court: the victim F (the remittance of KRW 1.5 million): the victim D (deposit of KRW 5 million): the victim F (deposit of KRW 500,000): KRW 2.8 million).

3. In conclusion, both appeals are dismissed in accordance with Article 364(4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, since both appeals are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.