2. The judgment of the court below acknowledged the crime of this case, and found that the defendant violated the Punishment of Violence, etc. Act (collectively weapon, etc.) and the victim D does not want to be punished against the defendant. The crime of this case is acknowledged, but the defendant was under the control of the victim D without paying the drinking value in danran bar, and was under the control of the victim D, who is a business owner, and was under the control of the victim D, and was under the control of the victim, and was in the care of small fire extinguishers, and threatened the victim with the death while taking a attitude that seems to have been discarded. The victim J who was under the control of the defendant was under the control of the above victim's head debt, and was under the control of the above victim's head debt, and the crime was not good in light of the circumstances of the crime, method of the crime, etc., and in particular, it cannot be viewed that the defendant was under the control of the defendant's age of punishment against the crime of violence several times on September 5, 2008.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.