대여금
1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendant are all dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
1. The following facts of recognition do not conflict between the parties, or may be found in Gap evidence Nos. 1 to 4, and Gap evidence No. 10 (including each number), taking into account the whole purport of the pleadings:
The parties’ relationship 1) The deceased on May 7, 2013, and the co-inheritors died on May 7, 2013, and there was Plaintiff B, E, F, and G. (2) However, as Plaintiff B, E, F, and G, the remaining co-inheritors except Plaintiff A, who were co-inheritors, filed a renunciation of inheritance with the Government District Court 2013Ra1045, and received a judgment accepting it on August 9, 2013, the deceased’s property became inherited by Plaintiff A solely.
B. On November 23, 2004, the Defendant prepared and delivered to the network D a certificate of borrowing (Evidence A-1 of No. 4-1) that the Defendant borrowed KRW 200,000,000 on November 23, 2006, with the maturity of payment fixed on November 23, 2006. (2) On December 1, 2004, the Defendant again prepared and delivered to the network D the certificate of borrowing KRW 200,000,000 interest rate of KRW 60,000 (payment on December 25) and the certificate of borrowing (Evidence A-2 of No. 4-2) that the Defendant borrowed on November 30, 206.
2. Determination as to Plaintiff A’s claim
A. The Plaintiff’s assertion 1) The loan certificate (No. 4-1) that the Defendant prepared and delivered on November 23, 2014 (the Plaintiff’s assertion) was settled as the loan without any interest agreement by settling the amount borrowed from the Plaintiff A and the purchase cost of the registered items that the Defendant asked the Plaintiff to purchase on behalf of the Plaintiff A at KRW 200,000,000, in total.
B) The loan certificate (Evidence A-2) that the Defendant prepared and delivered on December 1, 2014 by the Defendant (hereinafter “instant store”) is an “I” restaurant located in Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H from the network D (hereinafter “instant store”).
(C) The network D) on October 4, 2006, borrowed KRW 200,000,000 as the funds to start its business, and thereafter borrowed KRW 600,000 per month to pay KRW 60,000 per interest. (c) The Defendant additionally lent KRW 40,000,000 to the Defendant and thereafter thereafter interest on the loan.