When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

1. Defendant A

A. Defendant A, who interfered with the performance of official duties, was asked about the developments of the assault from E(37 tax) and F(49 tax) belonging to the police officer belonging to the police station located in the Dong-dong Police Station D (37 tax) and F(49 tax), on August 27, 2015, at the 1st floor of the commercial building located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-gu, Young-si, G, and 112 reported to Defendant A on August 27, 2015.

“E” In addition, the chest’s chest was tightly pushed up twice in his hand, and continued to be controlled to F, which was brought about by the reporter, such as: “Chewing snicker shall be designated, and police unnecessary,” and assaulted F’s chests on one occasion.

As a result, Defendant A interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning 112 reporting processing duties.

B. Defendant A assaulted Defendant A at the date, time, place, and on the part of the reporter, the victim H(20 taxes) this Defendant “low gue fe w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w

2. The date, time, place specified in paragraph 1, the defect that Defendant B arrested Defendant A as a current criminal, such as interference with the performance of official duties by a police officer, etc., to board the patrol vehicle, and whether Defendant B was carrying the patrol vehicle;

(1) The police officer E and F sold their arms in several times, and assaulted them.

Accordingly, Defendant B interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on the arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the examination of each police officer in relation to G or H;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each police statement protocol to E and F;

1. Defendant A of the pertinent legal provisions pertaining to criminal facts: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of assault) Defendant B: Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties);

1. Commercial concurrent defendants: Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants who choose to impose punishment: Each selective fine

1. Defendant A who aggravated concurrent crimes: the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act.