2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

(a) Announcement of examination;

8. The target system for gender equality appointment;

(a) Examination: A examination unit, the number of persons to be selected for each appointment agency is at least five (ten flexible-time persons, if applicable);

(b) Objectives of appointment: 30% of the number of successful candidates in each stage of the examination (if the number of persons to be selected is at least five but less than ten persons, a minority number shall not apply; and if the number of persons to be selected is at least ten, a minority number shall be rounded off below the decimal point);

(c) Methods of implementation: If an applicant for a certain gender falls short of the target ratio of appointment, he/she shall additionally pass an examination in excess of the initial scheduled number of applicants for the relevant gender, based on the sexual order, if the applicant for the examination falls short of the target ratio of appointment;

(D) Results: Passing - 3 points. The Chairperson of the Gyeonggi-do Personnel Committee publicly announced the implementation plan for the appointment examination for local public officials by open competition and career competition in Gyeonggi-do in 2015, and among which matters related to the gender equality target system are as follows:

The Plaintiff applied for Grade 9 B B in the open recruitment examination for local public officials at the second high time among the examinations publicly announced as above. The number of persons to be selected for the examination in this case is eight, and the examination constitutes the subject of the open recruitment examination for gender equality.

B. On June 27, 2015, the Plaintiff obtained an average score of 89 points on the written examination (joint examination of the first and second examinations) of this case, and the Defendant determined to have passed the written examination by setting up 12 persons who have passed the written examination. Among them, one male (Plaintiff) and 11 women are to pass the written examination, and one male is to pass the written examination by applying the gender equality appointment target system. However, there was no person who has passed the written examination due to the lack of “three points or more” (86 points) from among the male applicants who have passed the written examination, the Defendant did not make an additional decision on the successful applicants. 2) On August 28, 2015, the Defendant conducted an interview on the subjects of the written examination, and all 12 persons received an “ordinary” rating.

3. The defendant shall be the defendant on January 2015.