2. In light of favorable circumstances, or the frequency and duration of the instant crime, such as the fact that the Defendant recognized the instant crime and said Defendant would not contact the victim again, and that the Defendant did not have any criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine, etc., the crime is not good, and the fact that the Defendant did not agree with the victim is unfavorable.

There is no special relationship or change of circumstances that can be newly considered by this court, and in full view of the defendant's age, character and conduct, family relationship, circumstances after the crime, and various sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments of this case, the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

Defendant’s assertion is not accepted.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.