However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 10, 2015, the Defendant received a 112 report from the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, on the 110:37, that the fighting day is the same as the fighting day in the counter-party park located in 329 o, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Police Station B, which was called into the said park, and prevented police officers from performing their legitimate duties concerning the handling of the reports of 112 reported cases by assaulting the Defendant who was in the same manner as the slope C belonging to the Seo-gu, Daejeon Police Station B, who was called into the said park, for the purpose of assaulting E, at one time at the time, and doing so.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of laws and regulations on police statements made to C, D, and E;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of sentence of alternative imprisonment;

4. The degree of violence shown by the defendant for the reason of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not small, and it is also doubtful that the criminal records related to drinking are accumulated.

Provided, That the punishment shall be determined as per the disposition in consideration of the fact that the defendant recognizes all errors and reflects, and there is no criminal record related to violence, etc.