However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On June 12, 2012, the Defendant: (a) driven a Brener Brener Bren vehicle under the influence of alcohol content of about 500 meters from the section near the new market in Changdong in Dobong-gu Seoul, Seoul to the front day of the water tank in the same Dong from around 00 meters to the front day of the water tank in the same Dong.

2. A defendant who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act shall not operate any motor vehicle on a road where he/she possesses the said motor vehicle and is not covered by mandatory insurance;

Nevertheless, the Defendant operated the said B Car Beta in the absence of mandatory insurance at the time and place of Paragraph 1.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Making a report on the control of drinking driving;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on mandatory insurance;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, Articles 148-2 (2) 2 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty, Article 46 (2) 2 and the main sentence of Article 8 of the Guarantee of Automobile Damage Compensation Act, and choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (including the fact that the distance of operation is relatively short, and that a disposition is made to repent the error and not repeat it again);

1. Order to attend lectures under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;