1. Examining the grounds of appeal by Defendant B in light of the evidence duly admitted by the first instance court, which maintained the reasoning of the lower judgment, the lower court was justifiable to have determined that Defendant B was guilty of violating the Road Act among the facts charged in the instant case against Defendant B on the grounds stated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err by misapprehending

2. As to the Defendant D’s grounds of appeal, the allegation that there was an error in the misapprehension of the legal principles as to intentional injury, causation, or incomplete deliberation in the lower judgment is not a legitimate ground of appeal, since it is alleged in the ground of appeal that Defendant D did not regard it as grounds of appeal or that the lower court did not consider it as subject to

Furthermore, ex officio examination does not contain any error as alleged in the grounds of appeal.

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.