However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On June 2012, the Defendant, at around 20:0, 200, worked at C’s house where he saw alcoholic beverages with his usual hall located in Young-gu, Young-gu, Jeonnam. The Defendant did not know of the date. The fact that the victim D and C did not have any sexual intercourse with the victim’s 7 years of age at the inside and outside, and did not have any sexual intercourse with the Defendant even though the Defendant was living room.

Nevertheless, around June 2012, the following day, the Defendant, at E’s house located above B, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts by stating that “The victim and C opened a visit at the house of the control household C, and make it possible for the victim and C to enjoy by side. At the victim’s side, the victim was able to take care of the 7th to the son’s son’s son, and the son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son’s son.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to D and C

1. Article 307 (2) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 62 (1) does not reach an agreement with the victim, but the defendant appears to recognize and reflect