폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(집단ㆍ흉기등상해)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than one year and six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
On December 23, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 23:00, at the toilet located in the Young-gu, Gwangju, Gwangju, for the reason that the victim C (20 years of age) was smoking tobacco in a non-smoking area, and became a victim and Si expenses; (b) was sprinking the victim’s face by drinking flab; (c) was spicking the victim’s hair by drinking flab; (d) was flabing the victim’s head by drinking flab; (e) was flabing the victim’s head by drinking flab; and (e) was flabing the victim’s head by pushing the victim’s head into the flabing flab; and (e) again, flabed the victim’s flab by drinking flab from D (20 years of age).
이로써 피고인은 피해자 C에게 약 4주간의 치료가 필요한 좌 척골 골절 상해를, 피해자 D에게 위험한 물건을 휴대하여 7일에서 10일간의 치료가 필요한 좌측 귓바퀴에 열린 상처를 각 가하였다.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant's legal statement;
1. Statement of each police statement related to C and D;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each written diagnosis;
1. Article 3 (1) and Article 2 (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;
1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;
1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 500,000 won for victims C; Supreme Court Decision 1.5 million won for victims D; Supreme Court Decision 200,000 won for victims D; Supreme Court Decision 200,000 won
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (the previous reason for discretionary mitigation, etc.);
1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act, Article 59 of the Act on Probation, etc.;
1. Article 32(1) and (2), and Article 25(3)3 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Promotion, etc. of Lawsuits, etc. of Application for Compensation Orders, the scope of liability for damages, currently assumed by the Defendant against the applicant for compensation, is unclear.