When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 02:30 on October 31, 2014, the Defendant, while boarding a taxi in the direction of the U.S. while getting a taxi in the non-permanent area of the Do-dong of the Do-si, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol in the front of the Do-ro of the Seoul subway 1 Line in Dobong-gu, Seoul, Dobong-gu, Seoul, Do-ro 964-33, Do-gu, Do-gu, Do-gu, Do-gu, Do-gu, Do-gu, Do-gu,

The Defendant: (a) intending to take a bath to a taxi engineer; and (b) intending to do so by drinking, and (c) flapsed by B; (b) flapsed by flaps, etc.; (c) flapsed by the 112-reported taxi engineer and flapsed by the Seoul provincial Police Station C police box; (d) flapsed by the 112-reported taxi engineer, and flapsed by E; (c) flapsed by the flaps of the Seoul provincial Police Station C police box; (d) flapsed the police officer’s legitimate performance of duties concerning the handling of reported cases and the suppression of crimes by assaulting the flaps, such as flaps, in accordance with the flaps, flaps, and flapsed by the flaps.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to B and D;

1. Application of F’s written Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. On the grounds of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the sentencing conditions stated in the records of this case, such as the age, character and conduct, family relation, family relationship, home environment, motive and means of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, shall be imposed a fine like the order.

The circumstances disadvantageous to the defendant: The circumstances that the defendant was under the influence of alcohol and used violence to the police officer who was called into the 112 report and was under the influence of alcohol: the defendant was the first offender; the defendant was under the influence of alcohol, and the defendant seems to have committed an contingent crime.