beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2015.11.26 2015고단2779

사기등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On August 14, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to 4 months of imprisonment and 2 years of suspended execution for the violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Gwangju District Court on August 14, 2014. The above judgment was finalized on August 22, 2014.

【Criminal Facts】

1. The Defendant: (a) asked the victims of Pyeongtaek-gu (n, 64 years of age) about the development, etc. of 11 parcel of land owned by the victim during his/her advice on various legal disputes; (b) around May 2014, the victim’s house located in Nam-gu, Gwangju-gu E, that “F attorney-at-law is a member of the Gwangju City Development Committee; (c) can know through F attorney-at-law, who is a member of the Gwangju City Development Committee; and (d) he/she will enter into a business contract on the cancellation of green belt and would have performed the business thereof; (b) would have tried to prepare a contract on the cancellation of green belt; (c) would have changed the down payment; (d) the victim believed to have been transferred KRW 320,000 on May 28, 2014 to the account in the name of the Defendant; and (d) the amount of KRW 5 million on June 32, 2014 to the account in the name of the Defendant bank.

However, in fact, the F attorney did not have any relation with this case, and the defendant knew that he had been aware of high school, and the defendant did not have any intent or ability to cancel the restriction on the development of real estate owned by the victim.

After all, the defendant deceivings the victim and 28,200,000 won in total as contract deposit over two times.

2. Forgery of private documents and the display of private documents;

A. On June 3, 2014, the Defendant, without authority, for the purpose of exercising the intent to make the victim believe that F attorney-at-law participated in real estate-related affairs as above, to forge and present documents in F’s name in order to encourage the victim to believe that he/she participated in real estate-related affairs, and on June 3, 2014, “A” in the column of content:

참조조문