Where the defendant fails to pay the above fine, one hundred thousand won shall be one day.

At around 16:50 on September 19, 2018, the Defendant, a victim C in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, did not order drinking water at the “D” coffee shop, and appeared with the victim upon receiving a request from the victim for an order, and thereafter, the Defendant did not contact with the above coffee shop shop owner, but did not contact.

On September 20, 2018, the Defendant sought again at the same coffee shop, and obstructed the victim’s instant coffee business by force by preventing the victim from receiving orders from other customers, by preventing the victim from receiving orders from being subject to force, and obstructing the victim’s instant coffee business by force. In order to prevent the victim from receiving orders from receiving orders from other customers, the Defendant: (a) 15 minutes of the disturbance, including: (b) 13:06: (c) 15 minutes of the disturbance, such as: (d) 13:06: (e) 13:0; and (e) 2: (e) 3:06 ; and (e) 3:06 ; (e) 4:0 ; (e) 4:00 ;

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement regarding C;

1. E statements;

1. Voluntary reports on dynamics and caps of on-site CCTVs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report internal investigation (related to the verification of CCTV at the site), each investigation report (related to a recording file submitted by a victim, and verification of CCTV images at the site and a recording file of a victim);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspension of execution (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the grounds that there are some extenuating circumstances; Article 62 (1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution (see, e.g., Supreme Court