A. According to the evidence submitted by the prosecutor, such as misconception of facts (the part not guilty in the judgment of the court below) around April 2007 and around August 2009, Defendant A’s testimony made by Defendant A in violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (unlawful medical business operators), I’s investigation agency and court at the court of the court below, entry of an investigation report (related to the visit of a dentist and the attachment of medical records) made by the judicial police officer at the court of the court below, and the photographic image of H, etc., the fact that Defendant A provided non-licensed dental services to H and I for profit as stated in this part of the facts charged can be acknowledged. The court below acquitted the Defendant of this part of the facts charged, and found the Defendants at the time of the lower court’s testimony at H, I, and L’s investigation agency and the court of the court below as the house of H’s house, and found the Defendants’ failure to respond to this part of the facts charged, such as Defendant A’s injury caused to the police officer.

The court below found the Defendants not guilty of this part of the facts charged.

B. The sentence imposed by the lower court on Defendant A (one year and six months of imprisonment, and a fine of three million won for a suspended sentence, three years of a suspended sentence) is too unjustifiable and unfair.

2. Determination

A. According to the evidence duly adopted and examined by the court below and the witness I in accordance with the following facts and circumstances according to the following facts and circumstances according to the evidence duly adopted by the court below around April 2007 and around August 2009, as well as the violation of the Act on Special Measures for the Control of Public Health Crimes (Unlawful Medical Service Providers) around April 2007.

(1) H on April 207, 2007 at the court of the court below's ruling.