However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 05:30 on January 24, 2014, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim D (the 50-year-old age), who is his spouse, at the house of the Defendant, at the office of the Defendant, for the reason that the victim D (the 50-year-old age), who was his spouse, was late at the house, including 2 cage cages that require approximately five weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the injury diagnosis certificate;

1. Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, the choice of imprisonment;

1. Although the extent of injury on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is more severe and does not have been agreed with the victim, there are some circumstances that may be taken into account the occurrence of the instant crime (except that the Defendant’s violence is not justified), the Defendant does not have any previous criminal records, repents his mistake in depth and reflects, and takes into account the Defendant’s economic situation into account.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.